I believe that the limits of what science can explain about human health depend on careful research and strong evidence. Without research and evidence, we wouldn’t have anything to rely on or learn from.
As scientists, we usually start research with an idea of what we expect to find — this is called a hypothesis, or simply an assumption. We often hope that our assumption is correct. But that’s not always the case. Sometimes things turn out differently, and the data we collect may not match what we expected.
That’s okay. What matters most is that the research is done carefully and honestly. Whether or not your assumption turns out to be true, the most important thing is to report what the data shows.
0
Michael Kimwele
answered on 9 Jul 2025:
last edited 9 Jul 2025 9:27 am
Science is powerful but not all-knowing. Its limits in human health are tied to the immense complexity of biological systems and the evolving nature of knowledge. When data contradict expectations, science progresses by revisiting theories, scrutinizing methods, and encouraging collective inquiry. In this way, contradictions fuel rather than hinder scientific advancement.
Comments